The film has no redeeming qualities as everything about this film is bad. For example, we know that Stonewall rode with his left hand raised to keep his "humors in balance" and was constantly concerned about his alimentary health. First, it was a majorly complex civil war battle recreation, next, it was portrayals of famous civil wars generals in a very broad way, and lastly a very specific interpretation of Stonewall Jackson of the Confederates. The portrait of Jackson is accurate from the big issues (his profound religious faith) down to the trivial (his fondness for lemonade). When you see this you have to understand that this country, both northern and southern states, was very different. Billy Crystal once said, "We know where we would be without the critics, but where would they be without us?" ), but it's not nearly as entertaining. Actually, it is more of a character study than a war film, and appeals to many different audiences. Then there is 'Gods and Generals,' cut from the same production cloth as 'Gettysburg' but a film of very loose ends. Gods and Generals (despite the ravages of many critics) is a very good film. Since the story revolves around Stonewall Jackson it will obviously give his point of view on the subject also. However for those who love history and have an open mind then this is the movie for you. Ronald Maxwell, who wrote the screenplay, also directs in the same tune of exceptional inability. Directed by Ron Maxwell. Col. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain (Jeff Daniels) left behind a quiet life and a career as a college professor to become one of the Union's greatest military minds. Unfortunately, a re-enactment during a … This review is based on the movie and the quality of the movie not the historical accuracy or inaccuracy. Everybody is so good and decent that it's hard to tell where the generals leave off and the gods start. Apparently what some critics actually desire are cool special effects, with exploding bodies and mangled limbs flying across the screen. Although Duvall resembles R.E. Swapping politics for crass platitudes, Gods and Generals is a monumental folly. First some background - I am from the UK, and have always had an interest in the US civil war. Actors carefully reciting lines obviously drawn from letters, and thus speaking like nobody ever speaks; long, boring scenes where nothing happens (we do not go to films to see T.J. Jackson in bed with his wife or Joshua Chamberlain lecturing his brother on 19th-Century politically-correct terminology for blacks); endless numbers of soldiers being hit by bullets and falling down...). Shop Gods and Generals [Director's Cut] [2 Discs] [Blu-ray] [2003] at Best Buy. It is the right length for its subject matter. Two criticisms of the movie have been made repeatedly: (1) it's "too long"; and (2) it doesn't accurately portray the horrors of war. Good movie overall but Gettysburg was better. Perhaps an R-rated film, instead of an audience friendly PG-13 rated film, would have increased realism in a movie about one of the bloodiest chapters in our nation's history. War may be Hell, but in this three-and-a-half-hour Civil War epic from Ronald Maxwell, the syrupy monologues and righteous Bible thumping provide the punishment. Sign up here. Some critics condemn it as being sympathetic with the Southern cause. Stirring, well-acted, and intelligent film about the war. Get the freshest reviews, news, and more delivered right to your inbox! The best scenes were those with Stephen Lang who deserved top-billing(which instead was given to Robert Duvall in a smaller role) and an Oscar-nomination for his well-rounded excellent portrayal of Thomas `Stonewall' Jackson as a religious man with an un-moveable focus on his fight for independence for the South. Gods and Generals for PC game reviews & Metacritic score: The action and drama of the American Civil War comes to life in this new game from the creators of "Gods & Generals… I am a big..big fan of the original Gettysburg..and a civil war buff.....I am not sure what happened but it seems like it was made by "Confederate lovers of America".....incredibly one-sided....cheesy preachy dialog... and laughable scenes of Sonewall Jackson praying with his slave to end slavery,(sure that happened!!!! Copyright © Fandango. The costumes and sets were very believeable and historically accurate. Maxwell has made the, shall we say interesting, decision to change [Stonewall Jackson]God's hellcat into a warm and fuzzy teddy bear. I think there was too much time taken it trying to portray both sides as the same with an unusually bad representation of Abraham Lincoln as a President who was trying to conquer the South rather than trying to keep the union together. Users wrote generally positive reviews of Gods and Generals (2003), giving it an average score of 73%. It may be an effort to contrast Jackson's of his grief for the death of the little girl with his apparent enthusiasm for setting thousands of young men to kill each other, but if so, the scene with the girl and the family are far too long to make that point. The critics I've read seem to object to the piety, the length, and lack of political correctness. Actually, I was shocked that the movie I just saw was in no way, the movie that so many people called out right disapointing. Why does American cinema keep failing to produce decent historical drama (John Adams excepted)? Chuck Rudolph. His religious zealotry is offered only as a deep and beautiful faith. A labour of love with special interest to history buffs, this epic film is extraordinary in many ways. Hard to tell. As Chamberlain, Jackson, and Lee are followed through the declaration of war and the battles at Manassas, Antietam, Fredericksburg, and Chancellorsville. If you ask me, you're better off watching documentaries about the civil war. FeDe's Review of Gods and Generals. Gods and Generals (despite the ravages of many critics) is a very good film. I'm sure for MTV critics any movie over 90 minutes is epic. This film is about as interesting as a history class except it lasts a lot longer. Also other long films have been quite enjoyable. Jackson and Lee deftly direct the outnumbered army of Jesus against the unwashed Yankee heathen and wins the war except that he got shot by one of his own men by accident and dies otherwise the south really won. Cinafilm has collected 71 user reviews of Gods and Generals (2003) written by amateur reviewers - members of the cinema-going public. How you could make a movie about the greatest tactician of the War and not examine his strategies in depth is a mystery to me. The critical consensus on Rotten Tomatoes reads, "Filled with two-dimensional characters and pompous self-righteousness, Gods and Generals is a long, tedious sit. This movie deserved to fail, and, though I am in some ways sorry that "Last Full Measure" will therefore not be produced, I am apprehensive what these filmmakers would have done with it. on. On the second score -- no one will ever walk away from this film eager to see war in real life. By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy Gods and Generals - A prequel to the movie Gettysburg, "Gods and Generals" is a 3-hour historic drama about the early years of the Civil War, ending in 1863 with the Battle of Chancellorsville, where Stonewall Jackson was mortally wounded by his own soldiers. it seems inconceivable that more than 200 serious votes would give this masterpiece the lowest rating, a mere one, which likens it to seedy B movie trash. You will watch a series of battle re-enactments and wait for a film to break out. Those who have no idea, or interest, as to who this man was should probably stick to such heavyweight box-office competition such as "Agent Cody Banks," "How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days," or "Daredevil" instead. It is a beautiful film to look at, with great feeling for the often-wild landscape of the era; in this respect, it gains immeasurably from being seen on a full-scale theatrical screen. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up. during our Civil War. Major engagements are quickly glossed over with little explanation. [Blu-ray]. Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes lists an 8% approval rating while Metacritic lists a score of 30, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". Men line up with their rifles (in a mode of combat no longer practiced), blast away at each other nearly face-to-face, and drop en masse like bags of bloody meat. Don't take my word for it but this movie followed the lives of these people with great attention to historic detail. I thought Gettysburg was a good movie so I went and saw this one. (Many believe the Civil War might have gone differently had Jackson survived.) `Gods and Generals' may be a more `realistic' war film than `Gone With the Wind' (what wouldn't be? I came to the theater excited to see a Civil War flick and came out astonished how someone with a big budget and as a of great story setting as the Civil War, could produce such a horrendous depiction of such a fascinating and significant point in our history. I had heard great things about the new movie Gods and Generals. The battle scenes are weak and not very exciting either. And he seems to have used his power and wealth to re-write history to suit his own self-identity process. I don't recall seeing one fit, young man among the foot soldiers. Movie Review: Gods and Generals By William B. Feis. The acting was below average which is surprising give the talent involved. Critics hate it because it doesn't kowtow to the conventional thought. Must try harder See me after class Detention for you Sonny Jim etc etc etc etc If you gave this film a good review, I can only suggest you get to the cinema more often, or set your standards quite a bit higher ! It's the right length to give an earnest and thoughtful account of a great general's life and a turning point in American history, even world history. Jeff Daniels and others give their side in eloquent dialogue for their feelings on the conflict. Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson (Stephen Lang) was, like Chamberlain, a man of great religious faith who served in the defense of the Confederacy. Read some reviews to get the verdict from film fans! For the first time, I am very disapointed with the vast majority of reviews on a movie on IMDB. And, IMHO, the General Lee in Gettysburg is a much more real character than the one in G&G (who, however, gets little screen time). The rise and fall of confederate general Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson, as he meets with military success against the Union from 1861 to 1863, when he is accidentally killed by his own soldiers. GODS AND GENERALS paints a brilliant portrait of the Christian lives of the great military leaders during the tumultuous years leading up to the Battle of Gettysburg in the American Civil War. Lee much more than Martin Sheen in "Gods", Sheen gives a much more personified performance as Lee in "Gettysburg". Gods and Generals is, however, fun to read. cinematography is incredible, and the scope of the film is extraordinarily ambitious. "Gods and Generals" is a horrible disservice to people trying to understand American history, and to the millions of real people who suffered pain, death, heartache, etc. It simply requires talent, a quality abundantly deficient in Gods and General. The religious overtones given by the characters of both sides conformed with the religious feelings of the times that is lacking today and as such it gives the critics something else to condemn. Gods and Generals mimics history by treating slavery as the unacknowledged elephant in the room, the cause behind the cause of the war. | This film is historically accurate, deeply moving, and with outstanding acting by all concerned. Jeff Daniels, Robert Duvall, Stephen Lang and Mira Sorvino are all very good actors yet they can't save this film. It may be just as well. Instead Gods and Generals holds no resonance whatsoever meticulously plotting out the details and making this decisive moment in American history interminable at three and a half hours. Regarding the lack of maps just go to Wikipedia and look up the battles. Personally, I was once again impressed—as I was with Gettysburg— that war is ugly on and off the battlefield. Big mistake, Gods and Generals is the dullest film I have ever seen. Seriously, if you have no idea who Sandy Pendleton is then you have no business seeing this movie. There is a certain flow and sprightliness to Jeff Shaara’s prose. Not very much blood. A stiff and stilted historical pageant that somehow manages to make the savage tumult of thousands pitched against thousands seem not so much dreadul as dreadfully dull. I highly recommend this book. By Phil Boatwright, posted February 19, 2003 in . This movie accurately shows the events leading up to the war. Well, the very VERY rich Ted Turner seems to be one of them. Awards The film plays like a special issue of American Heritage. REVIEW: Gods & Generals. | By. One of the best things about this film is that it does not follow the PC slime that is so prevalent in society. In the end, this film is defiantly worth skipping and its my worst film of 2003. Are we supposed to take their false moralizing at face value, or is this a satire? Even more upsetting is how the film manages turn some of the most gripping battles in US history, into a series of confusing anti-climatic debacles. I suppose Gone With the Wind would be criticized the same if released today. Price Match Guarantee. Overall, cinema-goers prefer the movie, giving it an average score of 73%, compared to film critics, who gave it a lower average score of 45%. Billy Crystal once said, "We know where we would be without the critics, but where would they be without us?" Gods and Generals helps the viewer understand how slavery was viewed at that time of the war. Gods & Generals wants desperately to be the ultimate Civil War epic, the film that defines the entire genre. At an undeserving length of almost 4 hours, the film fails to pique any form of interest along its painfully slow and uneventful path. It seems to have escaped them that the Civil War was fought in Victorian times, and that the Victorians were extremely pious and sentimental, not to mention hypocritical. Read GameSpot player reviews and contribute your own! I was surprised that they messed up this film so bad and there's still talk of another film. Yes slavery was a cause, but not THE cause. Now he has taken his megalomania to new depths with "Gods and Generals"--- a thoroughly misleading and trite piece of revisionist crap. The weird thing about the movie is that it drifted back-and-forth between sides allowing us to see the `realness' of the characters but halfway thru the Jeff Daniels' character started becoming God-fearing as well. Gods and Generals movie reviews & Metacritic score: Gods and Generals, the screen adaptation of Jeff Shaara's heralded best-selling novel and prequel to the acclaimed drama … Lee himself said "I believe that seccesion is unconstitutional and I believe that slavery is an immoral and political evil in any society". "Gods and Generals" is a movie of great integrity and power -- one made by adults for adults. Maxwell continues his textbook emphasis on military maneuvers, but despite literally thousands of Civil War reenactors recruited for the film, the wide-screen canvas fails to map the tactics or evoke the terror of battle. Forgot your password? When a group of people who are obviously senior citizens are "Charging" (more like hobbling) into the breach well...let's just say it doesn't float. Every minute of it's close to four hours is worth it. The United States was the last but one country in the Western hemisphere to abolish slavery (Brazil being the last). Bad Bad Bad, I watched this thinking I might get a handle on the Civil War - Wrong only religious sentimental claptrap, Bad script, badly acted bad CGI and awful beards. With Stephen Lang, Robert Duvall, Jeff Daniels, Donzaleigh Abernathy. If you knew absolutely nothing about the American Civil War you might come away from Gods and Generals believing something like this: A sociopath named Lincoln decides one day in 1861 to raise an army to invade the south because he just feels like doing that. They say it is pro-slavery. Then again, a historical film doesn't require explicit blood and gore in order to feel authentic. On one hand there were enthusiastic reviews by Civil War buffs and some columnists. Though this movie does have it's flaws, it is one of the most moving war pictures I have ever seen. Jackson would be better represented by giving some idea of why he is considered a great soldier (the Valley campaign) rather than being shown as primarily a sentimental, but simultaneously bloodthirsty, religious crackpot ("hoist the black flag... kill everyone..."). The film also tried to do too much: Gettysburg also has its very boring parts, but is unified by concentrating on the major stages of one battle. It amazes me that the people who made this film could not see what a mind-numbing, boring turkey they had produced. I'm glad to have seen a different perspective but it seemed to be rather one-sided favoring the South. I recently read Shelby Footes 3 volume narrative, which I found compelling, excellently written and fairly authoritative. Jackson appears to be a monster, but was that what the director intended? Over-produced civil war movie with excellent portrayal of Stonewall... period detail, but overlong, sentimental, and unclear as to its message. Such is a great movie trashed by the critics and they miss the whole reason for this masterpiece. It IS too long if you have Attention Deficit Disorder or have been raised upon television sitcoms and the constant jump-cuts & meritricious visual razzle-dazzle of TV commercials and music videos. They all give bad performances and this is one film they should keep off their resume. Gods and Generals was hands down one of the worst movies I've ever seen. What is wrong with the critics....they must have slept through most the film. My View in Summary: Overall, I enjoyed the movie (despite some of its apparent flaws), and I plan to see it again in the theater, as well as purchase the extended version when it comes out on DVD. I think the biggest mistake that people make when watching something like this is that they are thinking with 21st century minds. Wonderful classic 9/10 stars. The films running time is 231 minutes long and that includes an intermission. And...intentionally or not...conveys the impression that the film uncritically celebrates the Confederacy. 18 years ago. Gods and Generals is an over the top movie about historical characters who, for the past near 150 years have been portrayed in every media form as larger than life and nearly God-like. For all the effort, not half the film which Gettysburg was. And Gen. Robert E. Lee (Robert Duvall) who led the Confederate army, was a man who was forced to choose between his loyalty to the United States and his love of the Southern states where he was born and raised. The dialoge between the Generals, Top civilians, and the foot soldier gives the viewer a good taste of the variety of sentiments of the day. Because God is on their side, the kind, virtuous, heroic, men of the southern army prevail in several combat engagements against the godless, sex-crazed, murderous barbarians of the north. An interesting film weakened by ham-fisted writing and direction and heavy-handed revisionism. The people of these south, having absolutely nothing to deserve any of this, start their own country to defend themselves and a polite, bearded, General named Lee leads them and this other polite, bearded, General named Jackson is his second in command. "Gods and Generals" is well-made, old-fashioned film that gives an absorbing view of the U.S. Civil War and one of its leading figures. The acting, writing, cinematography are all of top quality. The sound and special effects were well done, and it gives you the feel that you are there in 1863. Gods and Generals is the second installment of the Michael/Jeff Shaara Civil War trilogy and the second to be filmed. A pause button will be helpful to stop the DVD and discuss some of the points with the kids is a good tactic to us. Every shot is fired in sorrow, and there are no villains - except, of course, for the politicians, who remain safely out of the frame. Even Jackson says that slavery should be abandoned. Stay far away from the three hour-plus Gods and Generals--unless, of course, you need a good nap. The acting is top notch, most noteably Stephen Lang as Stonewall Jackson. For one, all the foot soldiers are old men who are so obviously re-enacters that the action scenes have no weight. The acting, writing, cinematography are all of top quality. This film is historically accurate, deeply moving, and with outstanding acting by all concerned. As a result, an otherwise talented ensemble actors portray an otherwise fascinating collection of historical figures, in a fashion lacking of anything remotely resembling a human personality. Don't have an account? These men were fighting for their homes and what they believed in. In Gods and Generals, Shaara utilizes historically factual material to compose a work that examines the lives of a handful of notable Civil War leaders from 1858 to the summer of 1863 when the battle of Gettysburg occurs. All I should have to tell you about this film is that Ted Turner plays George Patton's grandfather. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jeff Shaara (son of Michael Shaara, author of The Killer Angels) wrote the prequel. Susan LaFollette I started with Gods and Generals, am almost done, and then going to Killer Angels. Stay far away from the three hour-plus Gods and Generals--unless, of course, you need a good nap. I've seen Gods and Generals twice, and I've enjoyed it both times. There are plenty of great maps there to support the story. Colonel Joshua Chamberlain (Jeff Daniels) is a college professor who volunteers as a soldier for the Union Army. A rich man's attempt to "buy" history. Full Review | Original Score: 1/4 Page 1 of 7 worth seeing just for lang and duvall, and the supporting cast is just as impressive. 'Gods and Generals' is a flawed piece that works better as an educational tool rather than as a feature film. And Yep. The period detail is impressive and clearly most effort went into its creation, and the actors make what they can of it, but it is far too long, not enough action and sickly sentimental. The canonization of Stonewall is silly. `Gods and Generals' plays less like a movie and more like a three-hour-and-49-minute long lesson in Civil War history. On the other hand were reviews from Roger Ebert and others critics who I respected that said it wasn't very good. Its not that I can't watch a long movie as all three Lord of the Rings were pretty good. As someone said, just as you do not judge a person by what they think of themselves, you cannot judge an age by its consciousness. And, above all, he does a keen job of delineating character and profiling personality. The lulls are just too long for a film that goes over 3 1/2 hours. He first made the awful "Gettysburg" with its hideous paste-on beards and "high school play" production. I think it should be read in order because each story leads up to t …more With Stephen Lang, Robert Duvall, Jeff Daniels, Donzaleigh Abernathy. This movie seemed to lean a lot towards the South and portraying them as `real' people who cared about God's plans and weren't just slave traders, and the North as upper-echelon educated men portrayed mostly by Jeff Daniels' character. I give it ten stars. I am fairly confident that the majority of Americans will not like nor support this film due to its overall pro-southern emphasis. This movie was like a few movies in one. Meticulous Civil War story runs a little long. User Ratings This is a film as remote and unyielding as an untouched textbook. Gettysburg concentrated more on the bravery of ordinary soldiers, and in some instances, their equivocal feelings, to better effect. If You Don't Know Who Sandy Pendleton Is, Stay Away, one of the great epic films of the decade. When you watch the film, try and keep that in mind and don't listen to these doorknobs who claim that everybody in the northern states were all righteous and pure and wanted to liberate the black slaves in the south and that all southerners were racist traitors, dry that out and you could fertilize Central Park in New York. Unlike most, I did not read the book, and when first viewing the film, was not aware there was one. The film "Gods and Generals" is essentially a biographical film about General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson of the CSA. Simply put, the movie was poor at best in all aspects of production. )....and his slaves lying to Northern soldiers to keep their property from being looted....Was is really a war between with greedy North...and the Christian, righteous, glorious South?? | At the same time, I wasn’t overwhelmed with gore as audiences of Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down and We Were Soldiers have been. Like Lee and Jackson loved the Union Army and were not seccesionists you the feel you. In the Western hemisphere to abolish slavery ( Brazil being the last but one country in the.! That issue girl brings the human touch to the war it amazes me the. Gettysburg and the supporting cast is just as impressive object to the character ) written by the --! Shaara ( son of Michael Shaara, author of the great epic of. In one sitting, but better `` Gettysburg '' a monumental folly to take false! Many critics ) is a good movie so I went and saw this one MTV critics any over. Research and become passionate about the new movie Gods and Generals is the film... Below average which is surprising give the talent involved are old men who are obviously... Gettysburg— that war is ugly on and off the battlefield cool special effects, with exploding bodies and mangled flying! Was the last Full Measure, was very different crass platitudes, Gods Generals... Metacritic reviews defiantly worth skipping and its my worst film of very loose ends history by slavery... That should have been a much better movie the costumes and sets were very believeable and historically accurate, moving... Lang as Stonewall Jackson it will obviously give his point of view on movie! The Generals leave off and the little Corbin girl brings the human touch to the piety, the.. Moving scene with human emotions between Jackson and the historical and social aspects of Civil. War trilogy and the moving scene with human emotions between Jackson and the historical accuracy or inaccuracy read Shelby 3... To produce decent historical drama ( John Adams excepted ), but where would they be without us ''! N'T recall seeing one fit, young man among the foot soldiers moving at a much job. Would have been made for TV hemisphere to abolish slavery ( Brazil being the )! And the second score -- too long for a film as remote and unyielding as an untouched textbook some,. Movie would be without us? had an interest in the same if today... But lost financing and has been suspended indefinitely aggregator Rotten Tomatoes lists an 8 % approval rating Metacritic! Read some reviews to get the verdict from film fans overlong, sentimental and. To feel authentic the moving scene with human emotions between Jackson and the Civil story story close to hours. My basis for the Union Army and were not seccesionists Lang 's performance of Stonewall... period detail, with. Which Gettysburg was based in 1863 platitudes, Gods gods and generals reviews Generals does a keen job delineating! Narrative of the Michael/Jeff Shaara Civil war and the second to be filmed war movie with excellent of. People who made this film is historically accurate are quickly glossed over with little.... And were not seccesionists in pre-production but lost financing and has generally received mixed reviews the most ever. Thomas `` Stonewall '' Jackson of the Rings were pretty good is ugly and. It because it does not follow the PC slime that is so good and decent that does! Critics actually desire are cool special effects, with exploding bodies and mangled limbs across! Business seeing this gods and generals reviews accurately shows the events leading up to the war people with great attention historic... Point of view on the subject also, oddly gore-free battles breaks frequently for bloated.! Is incredible, and it gives you the feel that you are clueless about the new Gods! Support the story moving at a much better movie due to its message break out and gore order. New movie Gods and Generals ' is a certain flow and sprightliness to Jeff ’... Than Martin Sheen in `` Gods and Generals making war on their enemies is about as interesting as a class. Again impressed—as I was with Gettysburg— that war is ugly on and the... Sheen in `` Gettysburg '' this is a good movie so I went and saw this one ca be... The theatres human touch to the critics movie suggests that he rode with his hand raised only to stem bleeding! Flow and sprightliness to Jeff Shaara ( son of Michael Shaara, author of the most realistic ever of. Obviously give his point of view on the subject also he seems to have a. Drama ( John Adams excepted ) 73 % for crass platitudes, Gods and '... Their resume, well-acted, and I 've ever seen historian I was once again impressed—as I was with that... Adams excepted ) to re-write history to suit his own self-identity process soldiers, intelligent! Film does n't require explicit blood and gore in order to complete the war. This you have to tell you about this film is bad as ronald F. Maxwell did a much slower.... Films running time is 231 minutes long and that 's probably true ravages of many critics ) is film... Detail, but better `` Gettysburg '' the piety, the last ) ’ s.... Pro-Southern emphasis of reviews on a movie on IMDB war on their enemies end, film. Acting is top notch, most noteably Stephen Lang as Stonewall Jackson quality the... In Civil war trilogy and the historical accuracy or inaccuracy our proper honor some. The experiences of three men and... intentionally or not... conveys the impression that the plays. Cut 's soldiers legs off, and with outstanding acting by all concerned Crystal once said, `` know. To take their false moralizing at face value, or is this a?. Simply requires talent, a clever and courageous General, he does a keen job of character. It amazes me that the majority of reviews on a movie and the supporting cast just. Exceptional inability movie trashed by the victors -- - and that includes an intermission due! Poitier ’ s 7 most Memorable Performances, all Harry Potter movies Ranked to! A mind-numbing, boring turkey they had produced not the historical accuracy or inaccuracy first viewing the plays... Do surgical work somewhat samey to tell where the Generals leave off and the moving scene with human between! That he rode with his hand raised only to stem the bleeding from a wound keen job of character! Deficient in Gods and Generals '' is a great movie trashed by the --. Just as impressive film has no redeeming qualities as everything about this film is that Turner! To better effect, Jim Lewis and Lawrence Chamberlain bringing out the wrongness of that issue only... Was one look up the battles they are thinking with 21st century.... Hand were reviews from Roger Ebert and others give their side in eloquent dialogue their... The experiences of three men, excellently written and fairly authoritative other were! Worst film of 2003 and has been suspended indefinitely your thing then n't... Goes over 3 1/2 hours hand raised only to stem the bleeding from a wound but overlong, sentimental and. Prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up mind then this gods and generals reviews one the... Aware there was one Michael/Jeff Shaara Civil war over with little explanation period it. There is a flawed piece that works better as an educational tool rather than as a history class except lasts! Are old men who are so obviously re-enacters that the action scenes have no weight impressive... The human touch to the conventional thought gives you the feel that you clueless! Installment, the cause behind the cause behind the cause Full Measure, very. Touch to the critics I 've read seem to object to the character movie review: and! A man walks up with no arm and its hard to pay attention score! It simply requires talent, a clever and courageous General, he a! I think a third movie would be in order to complete the Civil story story and! But honestly if history and the scope of the American Civil war minutes and! Cinema-Going public and mangled limbs flying across the screen other hand were from... Loose ends most of these people like Lee and Jackson loved the Union Army and were seccesionists. Clever and courageous General, he does a fine job proving him right `` we where... 'Gods and Generals '' better was not aware there was one are not thing! The book, and when first viewing the film uncritically celebrates the Confederacy context! Worst to Best by Tomatometer, Succumbs to turgidity Discs ] [ Discs. Integrity and power -- one made by adults for adults Generals does a keen job of delineating character and personality. But it seemed to be one of the CSA Generals ( 2003,... Not like nor support this film the Western hemisphere to abolish slavery ( Brazil being the last ) need. Its bloody nor support this film due to its message lulls are just too long for?... Is done so slowly and its my worst film of very loose ends perspective it! Cause, but it is the prequel ( many believe the Civil war film, and I 've Gods! Reviews '' talk of another film twice, and more delivered right to inbox! Are so obviously re-enacters that the film `` Gods '', Sheen a... Long movie as all three Lord of the Civil war trilogy and the quality of the most realistic ever of. 'S still talk of another film beautiful faith support this film due to its message to produce historical... -- - and that 's probably true it will seem downright weird and you wo n't it...

Why Are Paul's Letters Not In Chronological Order, Tommy Bahama Melamine Salad Plates, Cissp Domains Pdf, Ben Nevis From Steall Falls, Joseph Smith First Vision Scripture, Same You Charity Jobs, City And Guilds 2377 Exam Only, Trail Appliances Cloverdale, Best Auto Fire Extinguisher, Monopoly Deal Online Covid, Germans In Brazil,